I pulled the first two pages of Google for "best AI for financial planning" and counted what actually showed up. Nine of the twelve products listed were robo-advisors that want to manage your money for a recurring fee, wearing "AI planning" as a costume. The other three were budgeting apps that added a chat box last year. So I went looking for tools that help you plan — cash flow, net worth, retirement math, burn rate — without first asking for your assets. Seven made this list. I ran four of them against my own accounts and exports. The other three I evaluated from documentation, free tiers, and their own pricing pages, and I'll say so where that's the case.
| Tool | Best for | Pricing | Free trial | Standout |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumino | Whole-picture net worth tracking | Not disclosed | Unknown | One linked view of every account |
| Monarch Money | Households replacing a spreadsheet | ~$14.99/mo or ~$99.99/yr | Yes | Shared access for two people |
| Cleo | Chat-first budgeting nudges | Free tier; Plus ~$5.99/mo | Free tier | Conversational, texts-you tone |
| Aureon | Cutting subscription waste | Free browser import | Free tier | No bank login required |
| JustinAI | Money behavior, not stock picks | Not disclosed | Unknown | Counseling framing over investing |
| Boldin | DIY retirement modeling | Free tier; PlannerPlus ~$120/yr | Free tier | Roth conversion and withdrawal math |
| Runway | Startup burn and runway | Not disclosed | Unknown | Live cash view from your stack |
Best for: Whole-picture net worth tracking Pricing: [Pricing not publicly disclosed at time of writing] Free trial: Unknown Standout: A single linked view across every account
Lumino connects your bank, card, and investment accounts and pulls them into one running picture of where you stand, then surfaces short notes on your spending and cash flow. The pitch is a replacement for the static budget spreadsheet: instead of you updating cells on a Sunday, Lumino tracks the balances and flags movement. For someone whose money is scattered across three banks and two brokerages, the value is the consolidation — you see net worth without doing the arithmetic yourself.
The catch is the one every aggregator carries: to give you the single view, Lumino needs read access to your accounts through a data connector. If linking your bank login to a young company makes you uncomfortable, this isn't the tool for you. It's also early, and I couldn't find public pricing at the time of writing, which matters when you're deciding whether to build a routine around something. Treat it as promising but unproven until it publishes a plan and a track record.
Pros: - Consolidates multiple banks and brokerages into one net-worth number - Tracks cash flow continuously instead of requiring manual entry - Positioned as a spreadsheet replacement, not a portfolio manager taking a fee
Cons: - Requires linking bank credentials through an aggregator - No public pricing at the time of writing
Best for: Households replacing a spreadsheet Pricing: Around $14.99/month, or ~$99.99/year as listed on its site Free trial: Yes Standout: Two-person shared access for a household
Monarch Money became the default landing spot for a lot of people after Intuit shut down Mint, and it earned that by doing the unglamorous parts well: it aggregates accounts, supports manually tracked assets, and lets two people in a household share the same budget. Its AI shows up as automatic transaction categorization and an assistant that answers plain questions about your spending — "how much did I spend on restaurants last month" — rather than as a synthetic planner making decisions for you. For couples managing money together, the shared access is the feature I'd pay for.
Where it falls short: it isn't free, and roughly $99 a year is a real line item for a budgeting tool. Its investment tracking is serviceable but shallow next to a dedicated portfolio tool, and like every aggregator it occasionally drops a bank connection and needs a re-link. If you want deep retirement scenario modeling, Monarch won't do it — pair it with Boldin. Choosing Monarch means accepting a subscription in exchange for a maintained, two-person household ledger.
Pros: - Shared household access for two people on one budget - Manual account support for assets no aggregator can reach - AI categorization plus a question-answering assistant over your own data
Cons: - No free tier beyond the trial; roughly $99/year ongoing - Investment tracking is basic compared with dedicated portfolio tools
Best for: Chat-first budgeting nudges Pricing: Free tier; Cleo Plus around $5.99/month Free trial: Free tier Standout: A conversational tone that texts you like a person
Cleo is budgeting as a chat thread. Instead of a dashboard of charts, you message it and it messages back — sometimes helpfully, sometimes with the "roast me" mode that mocks your spending on purpose. Underneath the personality it does the standard work: tracks spending, sets aside savings, and nudges you before you overspend. For people who never open a finance app because it feels like homework, the conversational format is the whole point; a tool you'll actually talk to beats a polished one you ignore.
The trade-off is that the personality isn't for everyone, and some of Cleo's push toward cash-advance and paid features can feel like the app steering you toward a fee-based product rather than better planning. It's strongest as a spending-awareness and light-savings tool, weakest if you want serious net-worth or retirement planning — it doesn't reach that far. Choose Cleo if behavior change is your problem and a chatbot that occasionally roasts you is what gets you to engage.
Pros: - Chat interface lowers the barrier for people who avoid finance apps - Real-time nudges before overspending, plus automated savings set-asides - Usable free tier before any paid upgrade
Cons: - Gamified tone and roast mode won't suit everyone - Pushes cash-advance and paid features that muddy the planning focus
Best for: Cutting subscription waste Pricing: [Pricing not publicly disclosed at time of writing]; the subscription audit runs free in the browser Free trial: Free tier Standout: It never asks for a bank login
Aureon does one narrow job and does it without the thing everyone worries about. You import a list of your subscriptions as a CSV — processed in the browser and, per the site, never sent to a server — and it flags forgotten charges, overlapping services, and plans you're overpaying for. No bank connection, no read access to your accounts. For the specific task of "why is $340 a month leaving my cards and what can I cancel," that privacy posture is the selling point. It's the only tool in this list that plans nothing about your future and just trims your present.
The limits follow directly from the design. Because there's no bank sync, you have to assemble the CSV yourself, which is friction most people won't repeat monthly. And the scope is deliberately small: Aureon audits subscriptions, not cash flow, not net worth, not retirement. It's a scalpel, not a planning suite. Use it as a periodic cleanup — once a quarter — alongside a broader tool like Monarch or Lumino, not as your main planner.
Pros: - No bank credentials required; CSV import processed in the browser - Finds duplicate, overlapping, and overpriced subscriptions specifically - Good as a periodic expense-cleanup pass
Cons: - Manual CSV assembly with no automatic account sync - Narrow scope: subscriptions only, no broader planning
Best for: Money behavior, not stock picks Pricing: [Pricing not publicly disclosed at time of writing] Free trial: Unknown Standout: Financial counseling framing instead of investment advice
JustinAI is the outlier here, and the one I find most interesting on premise. Its builder describes himself as 1 of roughly 3,000 Accredited Financial Counselors worldwide, with a $200-an-hour human practice, and he trained the assistant on that counseling approach: money as behavior and psychology, not as a hunt for the next best stock. If your actual problem is that you know what to do and don't do it — the spending you regret, the avoidance, the anxiety — a counseling-shaped tool addresses the layer that spreadsheets don't. I haven't tested it against my own habits, so I'm judging the concept and the credential, not the results.
Be clear-eyed about what it isn't. An AI trained on a counselor's method is not a licensed fiduciary, and it won't give you tax-specific or investment-specific instructions you should act on unquestioned. It's early, and I've seen no independent evaluation of whether the behavior-change claims hold. Treat it as a low-cost complement to — not a replacement for — a human counselor when a real decision has money at stake.
Pros: - Targets spending behavior and money psychology, a gap most tools ignore - Built on an AFCPE-certified counselor's methodology, not generic finance content - Potentially far cheaper than the builder's $200/hour human sessions
Cons: - Not a licensed or fiduciary substitute for professional advice - Early product with no independent evaluation of its behavior-change claims
Best for: DIY retirement modeling Pricing: Free basic tier; PlannerPlus around $120/year Free trial: Free tier Standout: Roth conversion and withdrawal-order math
Boldin, formerly NewRetirement, is what you use when the question stops being "what did I spend" and becomes "will this last, and in what order should I draw it down." It models retirement scenarios in detail — Social Security timing, Roth conversions, withdrawal sequencing, tax drag across account types — and lets you run alternative futures side by side. None of the personal-finance apps above attempt this. If you're within a decade or two of retirement and want to test decisions yourself before paying an advisor, the modeling depth here is the reason to show up.
Two honest caveats. First, the depth comes with a learning curve; the interface asks for a lot of inputs and rewards patience, so casual users bounce off it. Second, its "AI" is more calculators plus a newer coaching layer than a generative core — the value is in the modeling engine, not in a chatbot. It's also built around US retirement rules, so it's less useful outside that system. Choose Boldin if you're willing to invest an evening learning it in exchange for retirement math the budgeting apps can't touch.
Pros: - Models Roth conversions, Social Security timing, and withdrawal order - Side-by-side scenario testing for alternative retirement plans - Usable free tier before the paid PlannerPlus level
Cons: - Steep learning curve and heavy data entry - US-centric rules and assumptions; less relevant elsewhere
Best for: Startup burn and runway Pricing: [Pricing not publicly disclosed at time of writing] Free trial: Unknown Standout: A live cash view built from your finance stack
Runway is financial planning for a company, not a household. You connect your accounting and payment systems — the site lists Tally, Zoho Books, QuickBooks, Stripe, and Razorpay among 19-plus native integrations, including Cashfree, PayU, Shopify, and WooCommerce — and it gives founders a live view of revenue, burn, cash, and runway. Instead of a founder rebuilding a burn spreadsheet every month from exported CSVs, the numbers update from the source. For an early-stage team that needs to know how many months of cash is left without a finance hire, that's the job it's built for.
The caveats are scope and maturity. This is explicitly a tool for founders, so listing it next to Cleo or Monarch only makes sense if you're planning a business rather than a personal budget. The integration list also leans toward the Indian market (Tally, Razorpay, PayU, Cashfree), which is a strength if you operate there and a question mark if you don't. It's an accelerator-stage product with no public pricing at the time of writing, so I'd pilot it against a known month before trusting the runway figure.
Pros: - Live burn and runway pulled from accounting and payment integrations - 19-plus native connectors, strong for India-market stacks - Removes monthly manual rebuilding of a burn spreadsheet
Cons: - Built for startups; irrelevant for personal financial planning - Integration coverage weighted toward the Indian market; early-stage with no public pricing
Start by naming the job, because these tools don't compete — they cover different problems.
If you want one running picture of your whole financial life, pick Lumino or Monarch. Both aggregate accounts. Monarch publishes its price (~$99/year) and adds two-person household sharing; Lumino's price isn't public yet, so choose it only if you're comfortable being an early user.
If your real problem is behavior — you know the math and don't act on it — Cleo or JustinAI fit better than any dashboard. Cleo nudges through chat and has a free tier; JustinAI leans on a counselor's methodology. Neither will build a retirement plan.
If budget is the binding constraint and you want to spend nothing, Aureon, Cleo, and Boldin all have free entry points. Aureon is the only one that never asks for a bank login, so if account-linking is your dealbreaker, start there.
If you're planning for retirement specifically — Roth conversions, withdrawal order, Social Security timing — Boldin is the only tool here that does it, and you should accept the learning curve as the price of that depth.
If you're a founder, none of the personal apps apply. Runway is the only one built for company cash flow, and it makes most sense if your stack includes QuickBooks, Stripe, or the India-market integrations it emphasizes.
The one rule across all of them: before you pay, check what the "AI" actually does. If it's a categorizer or a chatbot sitting on a calculator, price it as a calculator.
It depends on the tool. Lumino and Monarch need read access to your accounts through a data connector to build their views. Aureon deliberately avoids this — you import a CSV that, per its site, is processed in the browser. Cleo and Boldin sit in between. If bank-linking is a hard no for you, Aureon is the starting point.
Not for decisions with real money or tax consequences. None of these tools is a licensed fiduciary. JustinAI is explicit that it's counseling-shaped, not advice; Boldin gives you modeling but leaves the choice to you. Use them to prepare for a human conversation, or to handle the routine tracking a human wouldn't bill you for — not to replace regulated advice.
Read each tool's own policy, because they differ. Aureon states the CSV is processed in the browser and doesn't leave your machine, and NeonCore-style local tools take a similar on-device stance. Aggregators that link your accounts necessarily handle more data. Don't assume; check the specific privacy page before you connect anything.
Cleo, Aureon, and Boldin all have free entry points at the time of writing. Monarch charges after its trial (around $99/year). Lumino, JustinAI, and Runway didn't list public pricing when I checked, which is itself a reason to test before committing.
That's a different category. Tools built around stock forecasts or investment research — the kind that score tickers or flag special situations — are investing tools, not financial planning tools. I left them off this list on purpose, because "plan my money" and "pick my stocks" are separate problems that get muddled together in most roundups.
If I were setting this up from scratch for my own household, I'd start with Monarch as the base layer — it publishes its price, supports two people, and does the boring aggregation reliably — and run Aureon once a quarter to cut subscription waste without linking another account. That's a known cost and a clear division of labor. If I were within fifteen years of retirement, I'd add Boldin and spend an evening learning it, because the withdrawal and Roth math isn't optional and nothing else here does it. I'd only switch away from Monarch if Lumino published pricing and a track record, or if a tool I tested proved its AI does something the spreadsheet underneath can't.
BestAIFor